Railroad Lawsuit Kidney Cancer
Rail workers are exposed carcinogens. Exposure to toxic substances like gasoline, diesel fuel, benzene and creosote has been linked with cancers and chronic illnesses like mesothelioma, lung cancer and bladder cancer.
Contact a railroad cancer lawyer now for a no-cost initial consultation If you or someone close to you has developed a serious disease which is connected to your job at railway.
Exposure to carcinogens
Railroad workers are exposed various carcinogens that are dangerous on a daily basis. These include diesel exhaust, asbestos and benzene. Numerous lawsuits for cancer of the railroad have been filed against a variety of railroad companies. These lawsuits have been filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) which was passed in 1908.
The victims who develop cancer as a result of exposure to toxins may be eligible for compensation. A knowledgeable railroad injury lawyer will review a claim of a victim to determine whether there is a viable FELA lawsuit against the business responsible for their illness.
A railroad employee could be entitled to compensation to cover medical expenses, lost wages, as well as other damages caused by their illness. A lawyer can assist clients in filing a lawsuit before the three-year deadline set by FELA.
Plaintiff James Brown alleges that he suffered from leukemia as a consequence of years of working on trains and being exposed to chemicals such as creosote, and degreasing solvents. He worked on tank cars brake shoes, cabooses, and tank cars. He claims he walked on railroad ties that smelled of creosote, and saw signs with crosses and skulls on train cars, signalling toxic substances. Railroad Cancer Lawsuit Settlements claims that he was exposed to diesel fumes while working on engines for locomotives or when he stopped in tunnels. The toxins caused headaches and caused breathing difficulties.
Failure to provide a safe Work Environment
While railroad work has always been a risky work, recent studies indicate that many of the common railway occupational hazards have a direct correlation to cancer and other serious diseases. Federal law requires railroad employers to provide their workers with adequate protection and guidance to ensure their safety. If they fail to comply with the law, they could be held accountable for severe injuries that cause death or financial ruin.
If you are a railroad employee or have a family member who worked for a railroad and you are interested in seeking legal advice from a knowledgeable attorney. An attorney can determine the extent to which your exposure to carcinogens during the job is enough for you to start an action. A three-year statute of limitation is in place, so you should contact an attorney as soon as possible.
Railroad workers are exposed harmful chemicals, including creosote and diesel fumes and exhaust. Often, these toxic fumes can cause cancer of various types, including mesothelioma, among other lung diseases. If you've suffered from any of these illnesses, it is critical to consult a skilled railroad injury lawyer right away.
The plaintiff worked for the ICRC as a carman/mechanic from September 1975 to December 2015. He claims that his position in the ICRC led to the development of renal (and later adrenal) cancer. He alleges that he was constantly exposed to the dangerous chemical carbon tetrachloride, which is used by railroads for cleaning their tracks and braking systems.
Negligence
A railroad lawsuit may be filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), allowing railroad workers to directly lodge complaints against their employers. To be legally entitled to damages, a worker must demonstrate that the railroad company was negligent in causing his or her injury or illness.
Plaintiff Greger was exposed when working on the railroad, to a number hazardous chemicals and environmental conditions. These included carbon Tetrachloride, which is used to clean rail and braking systems. He claims that the company didn't inform him about the potential dangers of this chemical which has been proven to cause cancer.
He also claims that he walked on rail ties which were coated in creosote. This substance was considered as a hazard. He also breathed diesel fumes in locomotive cabs and claimed that the fumes "gagged him," made breathing difficult and caused headaches. He claims to have been sickened by diesel exhaust while he was in tunnels while on an engine.
He claims that when he asked doctors about the connection between his railway work kidney cancer and his doctors, they refused to provide any details. He claims that this was negligent and that the railroad in question should have known about the connection between these exposures and kidney cancer. He wants to be compensated for his medical costs, pain and suffering and the loss of earnings.
Damages
The damages in a railroad lawsuit kidney cancer claim are the result of the combination of medical bills along with lost wages and other expenses. The amount of these damages can vary greatly based on the particular situation. A skilled attorney will work to ensure that you get the maximum amount of compensation for your losses.
In one example one case, a man aged 51 was diagnosed with myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 2008. He was a maintenance of way employee for Chicago & North Western Railway and its successor Union Pacific Railroad from 1976 until 2008 as a machinist. He was exposed to chemicals containing creosote as well as benzene and degreasing agents.
Railroad companies are legally accountable for ensuring that they adhere to safety rules. This includes ensuring that workers are protected from carcinogens. If a railroad does not meet its obligations in this duty and causes harm to victims and their families can be devastating.
Hughes Law Offices has represented thousands injured people, including railroad workers exposed to toxic fumes. Call us today for a free consultation with an experienced railroad injury lawyer. Andrew Hughes, the founder of the firm has been defending railroads in FELA claims for the majority of his legal career. He is familiar with the legal requirements and the risks that could result from exposure to the workplace.